Consumer Energy Report is now Energy Trends Insider -- Read More »

By Robert Rapier on Apr 24, 2015 with 5 responses

Highlights of the 2015 Annual Energy Outlook

Tags: EIA, projections

Last week the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) released its Annual Energy Outlook 2015 (AEO2015). The report presents updated projections for U.S. energy markets through 2040 based on six cases, defined as follows:

  1. Reference — Real gross domestic product (GDP) grows at an average annual rate of 2.4% from 2013 to 2040. North Sea Brent crude oil prices rise to $141/barrel (bbl) (2013 dollars) in 2040.
  2. Low Economic Growth — Real GDP grows at an average annual rate of 1.8% from 2013 to 2040. Other energy market assumptions are the same as in the Reference case.
  3. High Economic Growth — Real GDP grows at an average annual rate of 2.9% from 2013 to 2040. Other energy market assumptions are the same as in the Reference case.
  4. Low Oil Price — Light, sweet (Brent) crude oil prices remain around $52/bbl (2013 dollars) through 2017, and then rise slowly to $76/bbl in 2040 while OPEC increases its liquids market share from 40% in 2013 to 51% in 2040
  5. High Oil Price — Brent crude oil prices rise to $252/bbl (2013 dollars) in 2040 while OPEC’s market share declines to 32%.
  6. High Oil and Gas Resource — Estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) per shale gas, tight gas, and tight oil well is 50% higher and well spacing is 50% closer than in the Reference case. Tight oil resources are added to reflect new plays or the expansion of known tight oil plays, and the EUR for tight and shale wells increases by 1%/year more than the annual increase in the Reference case to reflect additional technology improvements. This case also includes kerogen development; undiscovered resources in the offshore Lower 48 states and Alaska; and coalbed methane and shale gas resources in Canada that are 50% higher than in the Reference case.


The Reference case is the EIA’s best guess — or perhaps most cautious guess — for what will transpire. For this case the government’s forecasters foresee Brent crude rising to $141/bbl by 2040. Even in the low oil price case they do not expect future Brent prices to drop below $50/bbl or future natural gas prices to drop below $3/million Btu. In the high oil price case they project oil rising to $252/bbl and natural gas rising to $11/million Btu:

Price

Key projections from the report are:

  • U.S. net energy imports decline and ultimately end in most cases, led by continued strong growth in crude oil and natural gas production, increased use of renewables, and modest growth in demand.
  • The United States transitions from being a net importer of natural gas to a net exporter by 2017 in all cases. U.S. natural gas net export growth continues after 2017, with annual net exports in 2040 ranging from 3 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) in the Low Oil Price case to 13.1 Tcf in the High Oil and Gas Resource case.

Production

  • U.S. coal exports decline from 118 million short tons in 2013 to 97 million short tons in 2014 and to 82 million short tons in 2015 in the Reference case, then increase gradually to 141 million short tons in 2040.

Coal

  • The U.S. maintains a competitive edge over the rest of the world in oil refining, resulting in growing gasoline and diesel exports through 2040 in the Reference case.
  • U.S. energy use grows at 0.3%/year from 2013 through 2040 in the Reference case, far below the rates of economic growth (2.4%/year) and population growth (0.7%/year). Declines in energy use reflect the use of more energy-efficient technologies and the effect of existing policies that promote increased energy efficiency. Fuel economy standards and changing driver behavior keep gasoline consumption below recent levels through 2040 in the Reference case.
  • Total natural gas-fired power generation grows by 40% from 2013 to 2040 in the Reference case—and the natural gas share of total generation grows from 27% to 31%.
  • The total renewable share of all electricity generation increases from 13% in 2013 to 18% in 2040 in the Reference case. Solar photovoltaic (PV) technology is the fastest-growing energy source for renewable generation, at an annual average rate of 6.8%. Wind energy accounts for the largest absolute increase in renewable generation.
  • Energy-related carbon dioxide emissions stabilize with improvements in energy and carbon intensity of electricity generation.

The report identifies numerous threats and opportunities for investors in the energy sector, but these can vary sharply among different cases. The biggest opportunities appear to be in the growth of LNG exports, the fortunes of U.S. refiners, the further expansion of U.S. oil and natural gas production, and the strong growth of solar PV capacity. The biggest near-term threat continues to be the weakening U.S. coal industry, but the report does project that the coal industry will begin to recover in most of the cases considered.

The EIA certainly has a mixed record regarding their forecasts, but many companies utilize these EIA projections in their decision-making process. Therefore, it is important to at least be informed about what they believe the future will bring.

Link to Original Article: Highlights of the 2015 Annual Energy Outlook

(Follow Robert Rapier on Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook.)

  1. By Russ Finley on April 24, 2015 at 7:18 pm

    Learn something new every day. I didn’t realize that we have been net importers of natural gas. Where has it been coming from?

    Renewable mix in 2013: http://carboncounter.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/usbiomass2013.png

    [link]      
    • By Robert Rapier on April 24, 2015 at 7:19 pm

      Canada mostly.

      [link]      
  2. By Russ Finley on April 25, 2015 at 12:35 am

    Energy-related carbon dioxide emissions stabilize with improvements in energy and carbon intensity of electricity generation.

    I’m guessing that with greater expansion of the use of lower carbon natural gas, emissions will stop rising (or rise more slowly) even though energy use may still increase?

    [link]      
    • By Forrest on April 25, 2015 at 9:25 am

      Don’t forget natural gas CO2 emissions a result of the fuels ability to utilized within efficiency of hot air turbine combined cycle. Meaning the Btu carbon rating is not that far from coal, just the efficiency of conversion. The EIA report may be indicating a bump up of coal popularity per the advent of easier or more cost effective coal gasification process that put the fuel close to that of natural gas per emissions via the same power equipment. Also, it is noted the low carbon ethanol fuel has similar ability to be utilize high efficiency conversion engines. The pollution stream of both fuels decreased per the fuels natural improvement within the conversion process. IOWs the carbon works harder therein pollutes less. There lies the rub in such efficiency ratings as Gpm within motoring public whom think they are doing environmental good choosing high carbon diesel fuel.

      [link]      
  3. By Forrest on April 27, 2015 at 8:29 am

    Most are scratching head to put faith in economy growth predictions. Their is no historical wisdom to rely upon. Were the largest debtor nation on the planet sitting with the strongest currency and fastest growing stock market? The future debt and entitlement load is very threatening as well. Consumer debt and bubble economics are in play and most look to time stock market per safety of getting out, not if an adjustment will happen. We have no supply problem especially of capital just a low demand per low income, retiring boomers, and consumer debt. Basically, were sitting on a false economy shelf once again. Investors worry of grand readjustment like Japan once bristling stock market that reset to 1985 and stayed. But, how could this be if Pritchards’s The Telegraph predictions come true? We are blessed at this extremely thin ice juncture of economic woe to have discovered and produced tremendous natural gas and oil wealth. I believe this will forestall the economic damage and will give the U.S. a chance to put economic house in order. That is if we even realize the need to do so or be able to temper the mindless fascism movement. To that comment if any real economic adjustment were to ensue, most will have even more trepidation of countries direction.

    [link]      
Register or log in now to save your comments and get priority moderation!