Consumer Energy Report is now Energy Trends Insider -- Read More »

By Russ Finley on Nov 26, 2013 with 7 responses

Energy Use in the Galapagos Archipelagos


I just spent two weeks on the Galapagos Islands. Their economies are driven almost entirely by Eco-tourism. Like the rest of us, the people of the Galapagos Islands are utterly dependent on affordable sources of energy for their existence.

As a result of a fuel tanker grounding and attendant oil spill in 2001, a consortium of energy companies from the G7, calling themselves e7 (created to bring renewable energy to developing nations), funded the installation of three wind turbines on San Cristobal, an island in the Galapagos archipelago, to minimize the amount of fuel that had to be delivered to run the generators. They also created a trust fund for maintenance and eventual removal of the turbines at the end of their twenty year life spans.


My youngest daughter is studying in San Cristobal. Her class took a field trip to the power station shortly after my arrival. I sent along a list of questions.

Her class was told that there is no wind for three or four months out of the year. They were also told that at least one of the five diesel generators is always running. When my daughter asked why the computer screen only had three icons for the generators when there are five of them, she was told that two of the three icons represent a pair of generators. Click here to see the photo my daughter took of the computer screen in the control room. The diesel generators were producing  over half of the power (162.5 + 222.5 =388 kW of power from the diesel generators, and 239 + 231+ 236 = 726 kW from the wind turbines).

The plant supervisor had explained to the class that the San Cristobal electric power system is a diesel/wind hybrid. I was impressed. Few people understand that virtually all wind turbine installations require the consumption of fossil fuel because they are part of a hybrid system that includes some form of fossil fueled peaking power plant to take over when there isn’t enough wind. A wind turbine without fossil fuel back-up is about as useful as a car without wheels.

The turbines are located on a hill about a mile away from another hill that has the only fresh water pond on the island (in an old volcanic caldera) which is frequented by frigate birds and the Galapagos White-cheeked pin-tail duck, which is endangered. The original site chosen for the turbines was abandoned when researchers discovered that it was in the flight path used by the endangered Galapagos Petrol returning to their nests in the night after fishing far out to sea.

While riding a bike on a dirt road leading away from the wind turbines, I found an endangered Galapagos Rail and a common species of Darwin’s Finch within a few miles of each other that had recently been hit by cars. This gave me an epiphany.

To put the bird and bat killing potential of the three wind turbines in terms of road kill, picture a 1/3 mile long oval race track in an area known to harbor endangered bird species, with nine equally spaced cars going around it at 180 mph, 24 hours a day (three turbines, each with three 100 foot long blades spinning at 25 revolutions per minute, 5,280 feet/mile, 60 minutes/hour, circumference = 2pR).

There are also three wind turbines (from a different manufacturer) located on the island of Baltra. Although it was always quite windy, I never saw them spinning. All of these turbines are essentially an experiment testing the viability of wind energy in the Galapagos Islands. Will they eventually fall into disrepair and join the rest of the abandoned structures on the islands?

I briefly discuss below a few other energy schemes that may also be effective at preventing oil spills.

Natural Gas

If Ecuador were really serious about protecting the “Mona Lisa” of biodiversity from the next inevitable oil spill, everything in the Galapagos would run on natural gas. Much of the taxi fleet in Buenos Aires (a city of 13 million) runs on natural gas, as does Seattle’s garbage and recycling trucks. The generators could also be run on natural gas. Petroleum products are heavily subsidized by the Ecuadorian government. Gasoline here costs $1.50 a gallon. This has, of course, created a black market for Ecuadorian petroleum products in neighboring countries.


Roughly 90% of the biomass here is from invasive plant species. One of the worst is the guava tree. A system might be developed to pay farmers to haul biomass (roots and all) down the mountainsides with their donkeys to a biomass fired steam turbine or  a power-from-waste combustion system with the intent of controlling or possibly eliminating some invasive species.

Power from Waste and Plasma Gasification

Decades ago, environmental activists successfully shut down the worst of the old technology incinerators in the United States that had little or no pollution control. Attempts to build modern power-from-waste or plasma gasification facilities (which bear no resemblance to the old trash incinerators) will usually attract a crowd of aging activists waving signs with the word “incinerator” somewhere in the text. All the same, most developed nations are using the technology. From the Wikipedia article:

Waste combustion is particularly popular in countries such as Japan where land is a scarce resource. Denmark and Sweden have been leaders in using the energy generated from incineration for more than a century, in localized combined heat and power facilities supporting district heating schemes. In 2005, waste incineration produced 4.8% of the electricity consumption and 13.7% of the total domestic heat consumption in Denmark. A number of other European countries rely heavily on incineration for handling municipal waste, in particular Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Germany and France.

Although there is a recycling program, some of the Galapagos Islands are, literally, awash with trash. Sea turtles and sea birds will sometimes eat plastic debris and die as a result. I witnessed scrap metal  being hauled to a dock and loaded by hand onto small barges which ferried it out to ships that had just unloaded cargo in the reverse order.


An economically viable technology to convert cellulose into a liquid fuel does not exist. It is still more efficient to burn woody biomass for electricity or heat. Humanity is the cause of the sixth great extinction event. Habitat loss is the main driver and agriculture is the main driver of habitat loss and deforestation, which is also a significant contributor to global warming. Because palm biodiesel or cane or corn ethanol require the conversion of ecosystems elsewhere into cropland, I would not consider them any better than oil when it comes to overall environmental impact.

Dedicated Bicycle Lanes?

Santa Cruz is the most populous of all the islands. The tourist district has dedicated bicycle lanes with a physical barrier separating bikes and car traffic. Bicycles are already used extensively on all of the islands because weather is rarely an impediment and because most destinations are not very far apart. Unfortunately, thanks to the low cost of motor fuel, there is less incentive to ride a bike than to drive the ubiquitous crew-cab short-bed pickup truck.

The Future of the Galapagos Islands

The population of the Galapagos is growing rapidly because there are so many young people who are just beginning to have a family or are not old enough to do so yet, and all of their children will of course have children of their own.

Thanks to ecotourism, the standard of living in the Galapagos Islands is much higher than on the mainland of Ecuador, although still well below most developed nations. It’s illegal to migrate there unless you are married to a  citizen of the islands, and it isn’t legal to marry somebody just so you can.

Fresh water is very limited and on some islands you shower and wash in salty water. Any kind of social upheaval that disrupts Eco-tourism or the supply of fossil fuels would be disastrous for the people and the wildlife of the Galapagos.

Unlike wildlife found at other Eco-tourism destinations like Costa Rica, the indigenous wildlife of the Galapagos never developed a fear of man. Nowhere else on the planet can you stand next to a sea lion at the fish market, share your fork with a finch (Darwin’s), wait for the occasional giant tortoise to cross the road …


…have a staring contest with a marine iguana.


  1. By Jennifer Warren on November 27, 2013 at 11:21 am

    What a terrific experience and nice colorings with your energy insights. I need to go there. Sounds like paradise for animal lovers. Thanks for sharing, truly…

  2. By shecky vegas on November 27, 2013 at 3:05 pm

    No mention of solar?

    • By Russ Finley on November 27, 2013 at 6:21 pm

      Although the islands get very little rain, a low marine overcast covers most of the islands for long periods.

  3. By Elias Hinckley on November 30, 2013 at 10:03 am

    Russ – did you learn whether the diesel based electric generation was subsidized in line with gasoline? Without a subsidy shipped diesel based electricity is typically more than 40 cents/kwh so almost any alternative source (including storage options) is economically viable if you can work around policy and legal barriers.

    • By Russ Finley on November 30, 2013 at 2:12 pm

      You make a good point. 40 cents per kWh is four times what I pay here in Seattle. Many of the trucks on the islands are diesel. I was told that all petroleum products are heavily subsidized, including propane.

      With water turbines and a large enough reservoir to pump sea water into and with a few more wind turbines, you could get by without the diesel generators most of the time. The pipes, extra turbines and reservoir would have a large footprint. Maybe somebody will volunteer to calculate the size of reservoir needed. The footprint of the diesel power plant takes up about a quarter of a city block.

      They would have to pump enough sea water to a large enough man-made reservoir at the top of the hill to power the island for three months without wind.

      They would then have maybe six wind turbines (instead of three) sitting idle for three or four months out of the year when the wind is not blowing.

  4. By Forrest on December 7, 2013 at 8:59 am

    Toshiba mirco nuclear good for 40 years of service and will provide 200 kilo watts of power upon a 20′ x 6′ footprint. The generator is self sustaining and shipped back to manufacturer when consumed. Cost about 5 cents per kilowatt power. Power can be located close to users. This a good choice for base load electric. The challenge would be to manage power use to level demand upon seasons and time of day. Remove the wind turbines per their bird damage and lack of reliable output. Utilize the diesel generators to affect peak demands. Utilize the modern heat pump water heating systems. Flex electric loads such as clothes washing to off peak intervals. Refrigeration like wise can be utilized to balance power load if utilizing the ice maker heat storage systems designed for night time regeneration. Water pumping and turbine electric generation good device to store power for peak demands especially for areas so close to sea shore. Diesel fuel excellent for vehicle transportation. Best to have small vehicles with modern ultra low sulfur fuel. Recycling wastes per anaerobic digestor for biogas production excellent. The fuel can be stored and utilized upon diesel type generator sets or turbine combined cycle for maximum efficiency. Same generator sets can utilize hydrogen fuel per hydrolysis of sea water created and stored upon over demand electric generation. The wind turbines could be put to use for this process. Save the diesel fuel for transportation needs. Cellulosic ethanol may be utilized per the availability of stock? Geothermal may be potent in that region? If so, start there.

  5. By Forrest on December 7, 2013 at 9:37 am

    Incineration of waste biomass is supposed to be efficient and green, especially with the knowledge of how damaging bio gas venting is upon rotting matter. Michigan State University has been studying the pelleting of biomass for energy production. Also, I’ve read of mixing woody waste with synthetic waste. The wood cellulose greatly improves the waste stream. The problem lies with EPA whom have exact and strict requirements. When blending feedstock it is more art than science, but overall the best solution. Most of the MSW could be utilized if using common sense upon the production of pellet fuel. This fuel is magnitudes better than coal for instance. This solution appears to be a good fit within modern waste stream. Pellets could be stored energy to offset low wind months.

Register or log in now to save your comments and get priority moderation!