Consumer Energy Report is now Energy Trends Insider -- Read More »

By Juan Aguilar on Apr 16, 2010 with 3 responses

Booming Job Market for Solar Energy

Many roofers and construction workers are finding work fitting residential and commercial properties with solar panels.

The Solar Energy Industries Association annual report indicates that the market for solar power nearly doubled last year.  The increased demand created thousands of new jobs and enabled the industry to buck the declining employment trend that many other sectors sustained.

“The solar industry added 17,000 new jobs coast to coast,” Rhone Resch, president and CEO of SEIA told the Mercury News. “Residential installations grew from 78 megawatts in 2008 to 156 megawatts in 2009.”

The report gave a great deal of credit to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) for stimulating the job market and nationwide trend toward solar power. Features of ARRA that were noted in the report include:

  • the Treasury Grant Program that allows the commercial tax credit to be taken as a cash grant for a limited time and lifted the $2,000 cap on the residential investment tax credit for solar thermal installations;
  • elimination of penalties for subsidized energy financing, encouraging state and local programs that subsidize solar installations without penalizing the customer,
  • creation of a 30-percent manufacturing investment tax credit (MITC) for equipment that makes renewable energy components.
  • DOE’s funding allotments under the ARRA, including$115 million from the Solar Energy Technologies Program, $1.6 billion from Clean Renewable Energy Bonds (CREBs), $2.7 billion went to fund Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants and $3.1 billion was provided for State Energy Program (SEP) grants.

The SEP grants were specifically noted for helping support the deployment of solar energy equipment around the country.

The solar boon had a particular impact on SolarCity, a California based corporation specializing in designing and installing solar panels. They nearly doubled their work force to 600 last year, according to spokesman Jonathan Bass.  In 2010, they expect to add another 250 jobs to help service solar enthusiasts in California, Arizona, Texas, Oregon and Colorado.

“About half of the jobs are installing jobs, and we’ve hired people from the construction and roofing industries. The balance of the jobs are in sales and marketing and engineers. These are full-time jobs with full benefits and 401(k)s.”

Unsurprisingly, California led the way in shifting toward solar power, installing 220 megawatts last year, compared to New Jersey which was a distant second at 57 MW.  The surge pushed California to a cumulative total of 1,102 MW of solar power, nearly nine times as great a capacity as second place New Jersey’s 128 MW.

  1. By CEA on April 19, 2010 at 10:59 am

    The cost of solar continuous to decline as more and more companies are getting in on the race. This presents two things from the viewpoint of the consumer: one that a competitive market can decrease installation costs; and two that the boom in the market can mean more jobs. The renewable energy boom has HUGE economic potential. The United States would be wise to aggressively pursue and streamline the measures to change the way this country uses it’s own domestic resources.
    Want to learn more about balanced energy for America? Visit http://www.consumerenergyalliance.org to get involved, discover CEA’s mission and sign up for our informative newsletter.

    [link]      
  2. By JoeSolar on April 27, 2010 at 12:50 am

    Subsidies for solar create solar jobs but destroy an equal or greater value of non-solar jobs. It is a zero sum game at best. This is no surprise to trained Ph.D. economist and reported now by Germany and Spain based on their experience. Here is a report regarding the German Experience: http://www.instituteforenergypolicy.com/documents/renewable_energy_report_rwi.pdf

    The reason is the poor rate of return on investment of grid-tied solar PV. A 1 kW system costs about $5,000 and will save about $50/yr in fossil fuels. (ignore the subsidies, they distort the true economics). This 100 year payback is much longer than the life of the equipment.

    Wind, biomass, geothermal and simple energy efficiency are much better methods of saving energy and reducing CO2.

    The solar market is, sadly, driven by special interests which have no interest in being “green,” except as it relates to the color of the currency they hope pocket.

    [link]      
  3. By wattana wonghajuk on November 3, 2011 at 6:51 am

    http://www.solcalor.nl/homesrb
    come visit our website hten you will know something more innovative is waiting for you to see.

    the Solar product is beyond far than your thought alongside with the idea that can reduce your cost and producing power in the unexpected situation.

    This IS a great opportunity for customer to decide what is the right product for you. what is worth and give you more than the moeny you spend.

    [link]      
Register or log in now to save your comments and get priority moderation!